Select Page

New Covenant, Part 3: The “New” of the New Covenant

In the first part of this study, we confirmed that there is indeed a new covenant in Jesus. In the second part, we saw some of the things that stayed the same between the old and new covenants. In this final part, we will look at what has changed and what it means for us.

It is interesting that, so far, quite a bit about the new covenant is the same as the old covenant. Not as much has changed as some have claimed. Of course, God did say He wouldn’t alter it or defile it (Psalm 89:34). However, there is one aspect of the former covenant that was changed, though not removed, in the new covenant. Our first hint is in Jesus’ statement that the new covenant would be “in His blood” (Luke 20:22; Matthew 26:28; Mark 14:24). Thus, the answer to what is new about the covenant can only found in His blood.

As we had learned in the last blog, Jesus’ statement has led some to believe that His death made an end to the law and obedience. However, we also saw how neither of those had changed at the cross. So what has changed?

To begin, we go to this interesting passage in Exodus: “Then [Moses] took the Book of the Covenant and read it in the hearing of the people. and they said, ‘All that the Lord has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient.’ And Moses took the blood [from the animal sacrifice – see verses 5, 6] and threw it on the people and said, ‘Behold the blood of the covenant that the Lord has made with you in accordance to all these words’” (Exodus 24:7, 8 – notes and emphasis mine).

According to this passage, one of the aspects of the old covenant was that it was inaugurated through the blood of animals. We find this same idea written in Hebrews 9:18–22, where the author makes the concluding statement, “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.” It is no coincidence that, at both the beginning of the first (old) covenant as well as the start of the new covenant, there is mention of the “blood of the covenant.” In the old covenant, it was the blood of animals. Therefore, it is Jesus’ blood makes the new covenant new.

This change was prophesied long ago. In a messianic prophecies found in Isaiah 42:6 and 49:8, it says the Messiah would be given “as a covenant for the people.” In other words, Jesus, the Messiah, would become the covenant to us. Another interesting messianic prophecy is found in Daniel 9:27—“He will confirm a covenant with many for one week. In the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering.” This may seem confusing at first, but should become clearer as we look at what Jesus did.

We know that the Last Supper was to symbolize His death, and it would be on the cross where His blood would be shed. So how could this change the covenants? (Again, we established that Jesus did not do away with the law on the cross, but rather our debt.)

As we learned, the sacrifice of animals was necessary during the old covenant. In fact, the whole sacrificial system, including the priesthood, was for forgiveness under that covenant. The priests would mediate on behalf of the people by presenting their sacrifices before God inside the Holy Place. However, that system was obviously flawed. Besides the fact that God promised to make a new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34), it was mediated by men who were temporary (they died), and flawed (they sinned), and the paid by insufficient blood (animals—which cannot pay man’s debt of sin). Then Jesus died and everything changed.

When He died, the temple curtain (that separated the Holy and Most Holy Places) was torn in two from top to bottom (Matthew 25:51). This very direct miracle interrupted the sacrifices, but for a moment, because a greater sacrifice had taken place. But, Jesus didn’t die because of His sins, but He died for our sins (Isaiah 53:5)! He became the sacrifice for us.

Instead of relying on the blood of animals, Jesus presents His own blood as payment. “For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God. Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant” (Hebrews 9:12–15).

Not only did Jesus become the payment of the new covenant, but also the mediator. Psalms 110:4 (a messianic prophecy) said that Jesus would be “a priest forever.” As a result of Jesus’ sacrifice—and resurrection!—all of the flaws of the old covenant were covered. As Hebrews 7:23–25 says, “The former priests were many in number, because they were prevented by death from continuing in office, but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever. Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost, those who draw dear to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.”

It is in this way that there is a new covenant in Jesus: His sacrifice and priesthood makes the first one obsolete (Hebrews 8:13). No longer do we need to sacrifice animals for our sins—Jesus paid it all! No longer do we need a human priest to mediate on our behalf—Jesus is our High Priest! This means that after three and a half years of ministry (half of seven), Jesus ended the need for sacrifices and offerings, by becoming the offering. This is what makes the new covenant new. What changed was our payment and our priest.

Did you notice that when Israel entered into the covenant with God, in Exodus 24, Moses poured the blood on the people (I know, gross isn’t it?). They started their relationship covered in the “blood of the covenant.” After the cross, we are to start our relationship with God covered completely in Jesus blood.

Yes, the new covenant is much better. Not because it might have done away with all the rules and requirements—because when you love God, His “rules” are not burdensome (John 14:15; 1 John 5:3). It is better because it is 100% effective. Because His sacrifice covers sins committed under the new and the old covenants. Because Jesus, our Creator, is our Sacrifice, our Savior, and our Mediator. The new covenant in Jesus’ blood is greater because it is the only way eternal life is possible. Praise God for the new covenant!

New Covenant, Part 1: How New Is It?

In an upper room, hours before He would be crucified, Jesus was eating what many refer to as the Last Supper with His disciples. During that meal, Jesus took a couple of items from the meal and told His disciples how they would now symbolize aspects of His soon sacrifice: broken bread and poured out drink. As He took the cup and presented it to His disciples, He said something very interesting, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood” (Luke 22:20). He told them that there was a new covenant in His blood.

His statement has brought out some very interesting ideas as to what the new covenant is and what it has replaced, or done away with. Needless to say, not all of the ideas that are taught agree with each other. It is easy to think that we can just pick one that sounds most logical (or suits our current thinking), but I am learning that merely choosing a side based on my own wisdom isn’t being a good student of scripture. I need to study for myself (like the Bereans of Acts 17:10, 11) and see what God says about the subject. So I did.

In order to keep this blog from becoming huge (it was a big study), I will share what I have learned over the next few blogs. In this one, I will start where I began with my own study by asking, if there is a new covenant, what was the old covenant?

First, a covenant in the Bible is an agreement between two people. In most cases in the Bible, two individuals are involved with each party having some requirements to hold up their end of the covenant. Once a covenant had been entered into, it could be broken (and often was) but breaking it came with consequences.

Now, of the many covenants of the Bible, not many really impact us today. There are covenants between two humans: Like the one between Laban and Jacob (Genesis 31:44 — however, this one was made based on lack of trust), or the one between Jonathan and David (1 Samuel 18:3).

There are also a few covenants mentioned between God and individuals: God made a covenant with Noah for deliverance from the flood (Genesis 6:18); He made a covenant with Abraham promising to make him a father of nations (Genesis 17:2, 4); and He made a covenant with Phinehas promising a permanent priesthood (Numbers 25:12, 13).

Finally, there are covenants made between God and a group of people (mainly the Israelites – see Exodus 31:16, 19 and 34:10 for examples). He made only two covenants that impacted all of mankind, one of which was promising to not destroy mankind again by a flood (Genesis 9:9–17). Yet, could any of these covenants be made new with Jesus’ sacrifice? How could they? None of these were impacted by the cross (ie: Jesus didn’t die to keep a flood from happening again).

However, the other covenant God made that impacts all of mankind is often missed. At first glance, it appears to be made with an individual, Abraham. However, it is also made with his offspring (some translations say “seed”). It may be easy to assume that Abraham’s offspring simply refers to the Israelites, but we must remember Galatians 3:29 — “And if you are Christ’s then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to the promise.” Abraham’s offspring represents all who follow God as Abraham did—in faith. This covenant was not made with a specific nation, or a specific blood-line, but with all who chose to walk with God. In fact, as we read it, we will realize that entering into this covenant is entering into a relationship with God.

The foundation of this covenant is first mentioned in Genesis 17:7 – “And I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offsprings after you.”

In this covenant God says, “I will be your God.” It is a covenant of relationship. And this covenant language continues throughout the Bible (here are a few examples):

  • Deuteronomy 29:12, 13 – “…that you may enter into the sworn covenant of the Lord your God, which the Lord your God is machine with you today, that He may establish you today as His people, and that He may be your God, as He promised you, and as He swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob.”
  • Jeremiah 24:7 – “I will give them a heart to know that I am the Lord, and they shall be my people and I will be their God, for they shall return to me with their whole heart.”
  • Ezekiel 37:23, 26, 27 – “… I will save them from all the backsliding in which they have sinned, and will cleanse them; and they shall be my people, and I will be their God. … I will make a covenant of peace with them … My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”
  • Zechariah 10:6 – “…and they shall be my people, and I will be their God, in faithfulness and in righteousness.”

Why do I believe that this covenant is the covenant that is made new? Besides the frequency of its language (especially when connected to a covenant) throughout scripture, notice what Jeremiah 31:31–33 says: “Behold the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that i made with their fathers … For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (emphasis mine).

Here is God’s promise to make a new covenant and notice how the language is very similar. We can already see some differences, yet the underlying relationship language is the same as the covenant made with Abraham. In addition, in Hebrews 8, when talking about the new covenant replacing the old covenant, the writer quotes this very passage!

Finally, this is what the last book in the Bible has to say: Revelation 21:3 – “And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘behold the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.” When all is said and done—when sin is no more and the earth is made new—this is the relationship God will have with His people. It’s the same relationship spoken of in the original covenant with Abraham and his offspring.

Do I Have to Forgive?

Anytime the topic of forgiveness comes up, people begin to squirm in their seats. It’s not that we do not like to hear of God’s forgiveness. His forgiveness is awesome—we love to hear about His forgiveness. No, we start to fidget because we know what is coming next: the requirement for us to forgive.

When this subject is brought up we quickly revert to child-like mentality (said as whiny as possible): “do I have to?” I am too often guilty of this attitude myself. I am saddened that forgiveness doesn’t come more naturally to me. I know I am not alone, though. Why do we seem to insist on holding on to grudges for much longer than we should and refuse to grant forgiveness to others? Do we actually benefit by holding the grudge? Not that I’ve experienced. Still, many of Christians want to know: do we have to forgive?

Paul said in Ephesians 4:32, “Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” Similarly, in Colossians 3:13 he says, “as the Lord has forgiven you, so you must also forgive.” According to this we do have to forgive. We are called to forgive because we have been forgiven. We are supposed to show the same forgiving attitude that God shows us. Yeah, I know, I’m starting to squirm too.

It brings to my mind a parable of Jesus recorded in Matthew 18:21–35. He told the parable after Peter asked how often one should forgive—or another way to ask it, how forgiving should we be? Jesus began by telling Peter that we should forgive someone seventy-times seven. (I’d say that is being very forgiving!)

Then Jesus told a parable: it was about a king who wanted to settle his accounts with those who owed him. When one servant who owed ten thousand talents (one talent was approximately 20-30 years wages) couldn’t pay, the king ordered him to be sold, along with his family and any possessions in order to provide payment. The servant pleaded for mercy and patience and promised to pay everything. As a result, the king had mercy and forgave the debt. Don’t let this slip by. He forgave the whole debt! That would be 20-30 thousand years of wages! Another example of the awesomeness of God’s forgiveness.

The newly forgiven servant left and soon found a man who owed him a hundred denarii (one denarii was about a day’s wage), grabbed his neck and began to choke him, demanding payment. The man also begs for mercy and promises to pay. However, the servant refuses the pleas and sends him to prison until the debt could be paid.

Once the king heard this, he summoned the servant and said to him, “you wicked servant! I forgave your whole debt because I took pity on your plea. Should you not have also had pity on your fellow servant?” Then the king reinstated the man’s debt and threw him into prison until it was paid off.

Then Jesus ends the parable with the statement: “So also my heavenly Father will do to everyone of you, if you do not forgive your brother from your heart.” (Matthew 18:35).

If the parable isn’t clear enough, in Matthew 6:14, 15 Jesus said it bluntly: “For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” (See also Mark 11:25.)

We are supposed to forgive. Plain and simple. Jesus doesn’t say that forgiveness would be easy. He only says that we should do it—if we also want forgiveness.

It seems a bit harsh, but if you think about it, it makes sense. If God is willing to forgive us our HUGE debt of sin, why would we refuse to forgive others when they hurt us? As the parable showed, if a person asks for forgiveness we must forgive them (Luke 17:3, 4 also says this—even if they ask seven times in the same day).

But what about the person who doesn’t ask for forgiveness? Do we still have to forgive them? I’m not sure I know the answer to this. At least, not an easy answer. However, when looking at our example, Jesus, I believe that we should. When on the cross, while being mocked and abused, Jesus prayed that God would “forgive them for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). Did they ask for forgiveness? No. Yet, Jesus forgave them and asked God to forgive them on their behalf.

Again, Jesus didn’t say it was easy to forgive. Forgiveness always cost something to the one offering it. When the king in the parable forgave his servant’s debt, he forgave a massive amount of debt—no small cost to the king. When God forgives us, it costs Him to forgive our massive debt. Likewise, it will cost us to forgive others. It is not easy to get past the pain and humiliation to find forgiveness and the scars may not go away, but we have to let go. We have to let go of their neck and find mercy and forgiveness. In fact, forgiving others has often a greater effect on us than on the other person. As Corrie ten Boom said, “To forgive is to set a prisoner free and discover that the prisoner was you.”

I know this is not an easy teaching. I also know that there are very tough situations we may go through that causes us to ask, “but do I have to forgive them?” Hurt feelings and damaged pride aside, I can only point to the Biblical examples given to us: according to the Bible, and Jesus Himself, we shouldn’t be looking for ways not to forgive, but should be willing to freely forgive as often as we can—just like our Father in Heaven does towards us.

What if God Forgave Like Us?

Two little brothers, Harry and James, had finished supper and were playing until bedtime. Somehow, during their play, Harry hit James with a stick and tears and bitter words flowed. The accusations and denials were still being tossed back and forth as their mother prepared them for bed. Before she tucked them in, the mother looked firmly at James and said, “Now James, before you go to bed you’re going to have to forgive your brother.” James thought about this for a moment and then replied, “Well okay, I’ll forgive him tonight, but he’d better watch out in the morning!”

I’m sure this was not the forgiving spirit his mother had intended. Yet, lives all over this earth are torn apart because of this type of attitude of forgiveness—“I refuse to forget the pain and agony you put me through, but I forgive you… for now.”

What if God’s forgiveness was like ours? In short, we’d have no hope. Unfortunately, many squeeze God into our way of thinking and assume that God does forgive like we do—“I forgive you for now, but you just wait until I come!” As if God doesn’t really want to forgive us, but is forced to because of some inconvenient rule He made up.

Is this what God’s forgiveness is all about? Do we have to beg Him to forgive us? Or, worse yet, is He like us and will bring back all of our wrongs as soon as we mess up again and smear them in our faces? Fortunately, the Bible says God’s forgiveness is MUCH different than ours.

Micah 7:18 tells us that God wants to show us mercy and forgive us and Nehemiah 9:17 says He is ready to forgive. Unlike mankind, God actually desires to forgive. Some believe that God likes to hold grudges and that He is waiting on His throne with a lightning bolt for someone to mess up so He can punish. On the contrary! God says that He does not enjoy the destruction of the wicked (Ezekiel 18:23), but would rather work with us toward salvation: “Come now, let us reason together, though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow, though they are red like crimson, they shall be like wool” (Isaiah 1:18). What a beautiful promise!

You see, God is ready and willing. He’s actually waiting for us. 1 John 1:9 says, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” You see, we have a part in it: confession. This does not mean that we are to simply list off all the no-no’s that we’ve done. Confession is owning up to the crime. Confession is someone saying, “I did it.” In other words, this means I am not merely telling God that a sin was committed, but that I am the one who committed the sin. (Unlike what Adam and Eve did.) When we are willing to admit that we are sinners, God is able to, and faithful to, forgive us.

The amazing thing is what His forgiveness looks like. He doesn’t just sweep our sins under a rug only to have them pop up sometime later. Acts 3:19 says that when we repent, He will blot out our sins. This is a complete erasing. it’s a multi-pass, greater-than-government–security, deletion of our sins. They’re gone—sins no more. Isaiah 44:22 tells us that God sweeps our sins away like a cloud. He separates our sins from us as far as the east is from the west (Psalm 103:12). In Micah 7:19 we are told that our sins are sent “into the depths of the sea.” (Ever wonder why the creatures in the deep sea are so ugly and evil looking? That’s where all of our sins are!)

This is all possible because God does something in forgiveness that we seem to be unable to do: forget. When God forgives, He does not remember them anymore (Hebrews 8:12). God says in Isaiah 43:25 that He forgets for His sake. He chooses to forgive and forget.

A great example of God’s forgiveness is seen in the life of King David. 2 Samuel 11 contains the story of David and Bathsheba. It’s not a pretty story. David really messed up and thought that he had covered it up pretty well. But in the next chapter (12), David learns through Nathan that he didn’t hide it from God. In fact, it was really God he had sinned against. David was crushed. He wasn’t sorry he was caught, he was sorry he did it in the first place. We know this because after his encounter with Nathan, David wrote Psalm 51. That’s the one where David asked that God would “create a clean heart” within him.

So did God forgive David? Nathan said God did (2 Samuel 12:13)—and this is what God had to say about David years after his death: “[he] kept my commandments and followed me with all his heart, doing only that which was right in my eyes” (1 Kings 14:8). Now that is forgiveness!

God’s forgiveness is complete, but it is not universal. Some believe, and teach, that God is ultimately going to forgive everyone regardless of their feelings towards Him, and everyone will go to heaven. Unfortunately, this is not found in Scripture. The Bible says that God will, one day, put an end to sin forever (see Revelation 20:11–15). On that day, He will destroy sin and any who continue to hold onto it.

While that day will come, today God is still saying, “Come let us reason together…” He’s waiting for you and I to admit we are sinners in need of forgiveness because He wants to completely cleanse us and blot out our sins. It’s not too late. Why wouldn’t we accept this wonderful, complete, and free forgiveness of God right now?

Photo by Ali Gooya on Unsplash

How Three Can Be One

Anytime a person commits to studying the Scriptures, there will be a few concepts that will pop-up that can make a mind spin. These seemingly impossible concepts are often used as a reason to not believe in the scriptures. Since our minds have a difficult time wrapping around the idea, we may feel that it can’t be true.

Some of these mind-frying notions are simply due to the limit of our human comprehension: the idea that God has always been (never had a beginning) is a good example. I think one could actually see smoke coming from my ears when I spend too much time trying to understand that one! Other ideas are difficult because of a limited amount of evidence: a great example of this is how the Sadducees didn’t believe in Angels or miracles because they felt these could easily be explained away and the Bible (only the first five books of Moses for them) did not specifically prove their existence.

It has been suggested by some that the doctrine of the Trinity belongs in such a group of impossibilities. It seems confusing because our minds have a difficult time allowing for one God to actually be three separate Gods.

One major argument against the concept of a three-in-one God is that the word “trinity” is not in the Bible. This is true. It is a man-made word introduced about 100-200 years after the Apostles. Yet, although the specific word does not appear in scriptures, the concept does. The word was simply created in an attempt to better describe the concept they found.

I have heard others attempt at getting around this difficulty by teaching that God is one but has appeared in three forms. Thus, the God of the Old Testament is the Father, who becomes Jesus in the New Testament, who then becomes the Holy Spirit after the resurrection. I’m not sure their explanation is any easier to understand though. It begins to sound like a Superman/ Clark Kent problem: neither is in the same place at the same time—they must be the same person.

However, there are several passages in scripture that disproves such teachings. A careful, honest, study of scriptures reveals that the idea of the Trinity has plenty of evidence.

One of the greatest evidences is found at Jesus’ baptism (Luke 3:21, 22): the description reveals all three at the same place at the same time—the Son being baptized, the Father speaking from Heaven, and the Spirit landing of Jesus in the form of a dove. This scene wasn’t a private one either, many people saw it, and John the Baptist testified about it (John 1:32–34).

Another passage that supports the idea of the trinity is when Jesus promises to send the Holy Spirit (John 14:16, 17). He mentions three distinct persons of the Godhead: He, Jesus, will ask the Father who will send the Holy Spirit. God cannot be the one person in three different forms for this statement to be true. Either there are three different beings in the Godhead or Jesus is lying.

There’s also Jesus’ Great Commission found in Matthew 28:19. Jesus instructs the disciples to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Once again, He specifies three distinct beings.

Of course, that’s the New Testament though, what about the Old Testament?

At the very beginning, during the creation story, we are already introduced to the trinity. When making mankind, God said a very powerful, and revealing, statement: “Let us make man in our image.” God spoke in the plural. He could not have been talking to the angels, for we were not made in an angel’s image, but in God’s image. To whom else could He have been speaking? Genesis 1:1 say that God was at creation (He created everything) and it also mentions that His Spirit moved over the waters. This places the Father and the Spirit at creation. Then in John 1:1–5, we are told that in the beginning the Word, or Jesus (vs 14), was with God and was God. It also says that everything that was made at creation was made through Him. It makes sense, then, why God would speak in the plural, because the Bible places all three—the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit—at creation.

Interestingly, throughout the Old Testament, God is always referred to in the plural. In English, we do not easily catch this though. The Hebrew word that is always translated as “God,” is Elohim. This word, however, is not singular, it is the plural form of the word. The singular form, El, is always translated with a lower-case “g” as in “god.” Thus, throughout the Old Testament, God was always known as, and referred to as, an entity containing more than one being.

But how can three be one?

Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” It may be easy to argue that this proves that He is one person. However, the word for “one” used here is the same as what is used in Genesis 2:24 when talking about Adam and Eve—“the two shall become one flesh.” No one would argue that Adam and Eve melted into one being. No, they remained two separate individuals, yet became unified. This word has the meaning of multiple equal things becoming one.

Jesus also said, “I and the Father are one.” He did not say that they were the same person. He said they were one. It was said in the context of unity. Further evidence that Jesus’ statement was about unity is found a few chapters later in John 17:11 when Jesus is praying that his disciples “may be one, even as we are one.” They weren’t meant to become one great big glob of merged humanity. Jesus desired His followers to have unity—the same unity He had with the Father. They were unified in purpose: Jesus was about His Father’s business of salvation and the Holy Spirit would come and help the disciple’s finish the work Jesus started.

This is just a few passages that provide evidence of a Three-in-One Godhead. All three mentioned in the Godhead are united, much like a husband and wife are united in marriage (at least in a healthy marriage there will be unity and equality). Although they remain separate individuals—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—they are united in purpose: the salvation of mankind!